Every VPN claims to keep no logs. Very few actually prove it. Here's what to look for, and why audits matter more than marketing copy.
Priya S.
Cybersecurity Consultant · April 12, 2026
No-logs is one of the most abused phrases in the VPN industry. Dozens of providers have been caught handing over user data to law enforcement despite prominent no-logs claims. The difference between a genuine no-logs policy and a marketing claim comes down to architecture, audits, and legal jurisdiction.
A credible no-logs policy must cover all of the following:
A policy document is written by the company's marketing team. An audit is conducted by independent security researchers with full access to infrastructure. Look for VPN providers who publish audit reports from firms like Cure53, SEC Consult, or Deloitte — and who commission them annually, not once.
CueVPN publishes its audit reports publicly. You can download the full technical report from our Trust Centre.
The most technically credible no-logs implementation runs servers entirely in RAM. When a server is powered off — deliberately or seized — all data is wiped instantly. There is literally nothing to hand over.
Even a perfect technical no-logs implementation can be undermined by legal compulsion in the wrong jurisdiction. Providers based in 5-Eyes, 9-Eyes, or 14-Eyes countries are subject to intelligence-sharing agreements that can force silent data collection going forward. Look for providers registered in privacy-friendly jurisdictions: British Virgin Islands, Switzerland, Panama, or Iceland.
When evaluating a VPN's no-logs claim, ask three questions: Has it been independently audited? Are the audit results public? Does the architecture make it technically impossible to log? If the answer to any of these is no, treat the claim as marketing.

Free plan, no credit card. Available on iPhone and Android.